11)
Message boards :
News :
Important news for Linux crunchers
(Message 36767)
Posted 3669 days ago by microchip microchip, I doubt that. I've done stress tests on both its memory and the GPU itself. It passes every time. It crunched without issues in the past the CUDA5 apps. Every since CUDA6 tasks came, they started to fail on it |
12)
Message boards :
News :
Important news for Linux crunchers
(Message 36740)
Posted 3670 days ago by microchip I'm still getting errors on the CUDA6 short tasks on my GTX 560. Yes, I tried the boinc version in this thread. Doesn't make a difference. Almost 98% of all CUDA6 tasks error out either immediately or they crunch for some time and then error out. Error codes don't give a clue about what has gone wrong GPUGRID is the buggiest project I've crunched for thus far |
13)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
SWAN : FATAL : Cuda driver error 3 in file 'swanlibnv2.cpp' in line 446.
(Message 36574)
Posted 3678 days ago by microchip Bump? Still having issues with the CUDA6 tasks. most error out on my GTX 560. They only seem to run reliably on my low-end GT 440. CUDA5 tasks have no problem on both my cards |
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
SWAN : FATAL : Cuda driver error 3 in file 'swanlibnv2.cpp' in line 446.
(Message 36185)
Posted 3691 days ago by microchip Same here on Linux with latest beta NV driver on Short. Most tasks error out immediately and every once in a while a task completes. All tasks are from SANTI |
15)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
What is so hard about Linux?
(Message 35072)
Posted 3744 days ago by microchip Why do you think IBM adopted it? Because the software was so amazing? For Christ's sake, the early versions were bug-filled. Actually, it is accurate. MS does pay HW manufacturers to prefer Win over anything else. Just like it recently paid Samsung, Sony and others to make Windows phones ;) But hey, when you're rich and desperate, why not just buy your way in, huh? ;) No, i don't think opportunities is a dirty word. What I think is dirty is how it's executed by Billy ;) |
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
What is so hard about Linux?
(Message 35070)
Posted 3744 days ago by microchip Actually, no. The limitations are only in your little experienced mind. You also might wanna read up on why Windows became the default on all sold PCs (hint, hint, MS pays HW manufacturers) and also read on what happened during the UNIX wars that your beloved Bill exploited to become the dominant player Why do you think IBM adopted it? Because the software was so amazing? For Christ's sake, the early versions were bug-filled. In the initial planning, IBM was pushing its own OS for the PC-compatible, only the BASIC-interpreter was to be made by MS. After time, when IBM saw their new OS didn't progress as planned, they went to MS and MS agreed to deliver the OS. Billy initially planned to write it himself but soon went searching at other firms until he discovered QDOS that MS bought for 50.000 dollars and developed it further.... if you want more history, there's this amazing search engine called Google that can help you No, because Billy boy exploited yet another opportunity ;) Ad-hominem attacks to "try another universe" don't work on me ;) |
17)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
What is so hard about Linux?
(Message 35065)
Posted 3744 days ago by microchip
Actually, no. The limitations are only in your little experienced mind. You also might wanna read up on why Windows became the default on all sold PCs (hint, hint, MS pays HW manufacturers) and also read on what happened during the UNIX wars that your beloved Bill exploited to become the dominant player Oh boy, for someone who "used vi even before most on this forum were born", you surely don't know a lot of history Anyways, I see where this is going. Windows Vs Linux, and not the OPs original intent to make the transition to Linux painless for new crunchers. |
18)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
What is so hard about Linux?
(Message 35064)
Posted 3744 days ago by microchip This is the problem with most people. They try out something totally different and new to them, see it doesn't work like the thing they're used to, and get discouraged and go back to their familiar stuff. Which limitation exactly? The only thing you said is that you prefer not to see or use vi again. You didn't explain why, unless I missed it. Do you think I find all software for Linux/UNIX awesome? Or that I think UNIX/Linux doesn't have issues? Of course there's software that sucks or that a person doesn't like it. I also have my preference about which desktop environment I use, which CLI editor, which GUI editor, which language I use for scripting, etc, etc If my mom was alive, I'm sure she can set it up. Don't think that just because my mom doesn't know computers much, she lacks the brainpower to set something up. Given enough time and a bit of research, she can do it :) |
19)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
What is so hard about Linux?
(Message 35060)
Posted 3744 days ago by microchip This is the problem with most people. They try out something totally different and new to them, see it doesn't work like the thing they're used to, and get discouraged and go back to their familiar stuff. LOL? This is your reply. I tried software X many years ago, I didn't like Software X for OS Y, so all software made for OS Y must be equally bad, including the OS Y itself. You might wanna look up logical fallacies. I'm sure yours classifies as one If my mom can learn to use Linux in a week, knowing how my mom thinks and acts, I'm sure many more people will have no problem learning it too. It's just that they lack some things that prevents them, like little time, lazy, no interest, busy with other stuff, etc In reply to your partitioning issue, the reason people don't know how to do it, is because Windows is pre-installed on PCs. 90% of people buy PCs with it already functioning so they don't need to bother or learn how to do it. If you need to install Windows yourself, Windows itself already makes a sane default that you just need to accept. Guess what? Most if not all Linux installers do the same. Regular people don't install Windows. They are happy if all is set up and they can use it. If something goes bad and they can't fix it, the PC shop will do it for a small fee. This is what I call "dumbing down" people Personally, I'm very thankful UNIX and Linux exist. Without them, I would never have learned how to program, set up servers, write websites, automate tasks and let the computer work for me without me looking, and even get into crunching (which is thanks to Linux). Anyways, I'm not trying to convince you here. Not even trying to change your mind. Just don't make assumptions based on very limited experiences and throw out statements like "I didn't like X so X must be bad for others too as I'll never recommend it". In response to Bill Gates. Guess what? Gates didn't got rich from writing Windows himself. He stole and built on already existing, often raw, technology. This in combination with his genius-like, business-centric mind is what got him the money. it's called exploiting opportunities and sometimes being at the right time at the right place The "developer of Linux" is not a billionair because that's not his goal. He does it for the love of technology, while Gates' underlying drive was to get rich in addition to setting a computer in every home. |
20)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
What is so hard about Linux?
(Message 35053)
Posted 3744 days ago by microchip
No doubt Windows is easy. It's what you know. Don't expect Linux to work/look/behave the same. After all, if it did, what's the point in having it? It's not hopeless for home use. My mom used to use it after some getting used to. She watches mostly movies on it and does some mail reading. My mom is both a techno-phobic and tech-illiterate so anything to do with technology, she's scare of and not very interested in. Sadly, my mom is no longer (died of cancer a year ago). And here's the thing and "advantage" she has. She's never used computers much, so it doesn't matter to her whether it's Windows or Linux. I just put her in front and explained a few things on how to use it and where stuff goes to (like saving in /home/username, etc). After a few days, she stopped asking questions and got familiar. Never complained once about it. The "advantage" here is, from the perspective of a person who's never used a PC, it doesn't matter what you offer them. If they have the support, eventually they'll learn to use it with ease I use it on all my home computers and is just fine for home use. I don't have problems with permissions, watching or encoding videos, listening to and managing my music, writing websites, writing documents, etc. Of course, I'm very familiar with it but I wasn't born with that knowledge. It takes both time and effort to get to know a new platform. I've been there and seen it all from the beginning. Everyone's been a noob at some point, right? :) This is the problem with most people. They try out something totally different and new to them, see it doesn't work like the thing they're used to, and get discouraged and go back to their familiar stuff. "Not having enthusiasm" translates to me as "I just gave up" because I'm not interested/lazy/takes too much time/etc. Look at Win8. A lot of people I know are just confused by Metro and want their old familiar desktop back. Same thing applies to Linux. It's different so they want the old back instead of sticking with the different and learning it. But it takes effort and persistence |
Previous 10 | Next 10