Why FFA Submissions and Link Farm Really are a Bad Idea

Team info
DescriptionBefore search engines got intelligent, a site's page position was according to key-word match-ups. The incorrect sites were getting too much attention, when webmasters stock-piled their sites with keywords. Google decided to focus on a site's 'recognition' instead. The number of incoming links became the focus of PR conditions. The idea behind this method was that if a lot of websites link to another site, that site would contain valuable information.

But again, webmasters got sneaky. With this development, we began to see the evolution of 'Link Farms' and 'Free-for-All' (FFA) websites. These pages were essentially a collection of (often times) worthless links. In most cases, the sites were not classified or descriptive. They became a place for webmasters to eliminate their links to be able to make their site seem popular.

This strategy worked for a while, but soon se's caught on. 'Link Farms' and FFA internet sites served no purpose to internet users. Since Google prides itself on catering to internet users (and NOT developers), a solution needed to be created. For different viewpoints, please consider peeping at: link emperor result. 'Link Farms' were filling up the net and making it harder for users to find important resources o-nline.

Google soon begun to rate the standard of the links that identified a site's 'link pop.' 'Link Farms' and FFA web sites became labeled as junk, and hence added no importance to a site's link popularity.

To-day, submitting to your 'Link Farm' or FFA site may be harmful to your website's name. Google has a strong position against most of these link pages. At most readily useful, the 'Link Farm' may get down your rank and make it harder for the important web sites to work in your favor. At worst, your site will be BANNED completely for using junk sites to try to create traffic. It is a very real possibility.

'Link Farms' and FFA sites provide almost no importance. My aunt discovered continue reading by searching the Internet. Customers will not obtain quality or related links from your submission, even though it may appear tempting. Plus, who would like to see their link among 'trash' sites for adult entertainment, internet dating sites, and casinos? Publishing to 'Link Farms' does not contribute to your standing and is simply not worth the risk. To discover more, consider checking out: link emperor review. For another perspective, we understand people check-out: link emperor forum.

As an alternative, spend your own time submitting to credible directories and exchanging links with other related sites. The procedure may be time-consuming, nonetheless it could be the only way to generate safe, site-specific traffic.

For an easier method to the tedious index distribution process, and to Submit your site to 300+ link websites easy and fast we suggest Directory Submitter..
Web sitehttp://www.warriorforum.com/warrior-special-offers/436149-important-link-emperor-reviews-comments-unbiased-discussion.html
Total credit0
Recent average credit0
Cross-project statsBOINCstats.com
CountryUnited States
TypeSecondary school
Founder peacetaxi0
New members in last day0
Total members1 (view)
Active members0 (view)
Members with credit0 (view)