Advanced search

Message boards : Wish list : Big Credits for Big WU's

Author Message
Send message
Joined: 31 May 10
Posts: 48
Credit: 28,893,779
RAC: 0
Scientific publications
Message 23108 - Posted: 23 Jan 2012 | 19:21:55 UTC
Last modified: 23 Jan 2012 | 19:27:25 UTC

I recently encountered a situation where my system was processing some very large WU's from the short run side and getting very poor credit for the work done. Long run WU's of equivalent length are giving 3-4x the credit. Is there any way this can be better normalized? Or maybe just roll these large HIV units over to the long run side? The whole point to credits imo is to indicate how much work your systems have done. It would be great to be able to contribute to all subprojects and not feel that we're being shorted.

Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 9 Dec 08
Posts: 947
Credit: 4,353,973
RAC: 32
Scientific publications
Message 23116 - Posted: 24 Jan 2012 | 0:52:23 UTC - in response to Message 23108.

The long WUs should give 2x the credits as the short ones.

Temporarily we have "not so long" long WUs, which will disappear over time.

Post to thread

Message boards : Wish list : Big Credits for Big WU's